Expanding on my previous post, Sunday’s NY Times had an article about the reconstruction efforts in New Orleans and Louisiana in general and how the stimulus spent by the government to rebuild has had a major effect on the area, supporting jobs and demand.
Gov. Jindal, of course, trying to kowtow to an out-of-touch crowd trying to look after their own special interests, rejects any such help.
Nice to know the citizens of Louisiana are being served so well.
The Republicans announced their alternate budget (for real, this time!) late last week. Here’s a snapshot of their great ideas:
House Republicans yesterday unveiled a more complete proposal that would cut taxes for businesses and the wealthy, freeze most government spending for five years, halt spending approved in the economic stimulus package and slash federal health programs for the poor and elderly.
And you wonder why we’re in this mess? In a timeframe when demand is dropping for all kinds of goods and services, slashing business taxes and taxes for the wealthy, while reducing support for those who already lack access to basic goods, is a recipe for even further declines. Those who already have money beyond the basic services will only save any incremental income to conserve resources, while those who are marginal would otherwise spend incremental income on basic necessities, thus stimulating demand. A scenario of falling demand requires the opposite approach, to support those most at risk financially while requiring those who have more to contribute a larger share.
Seriously, this plan sounds like robbing the poor to pay the rich. A swell plan.
Really? That was my first reaction when I read the news that the Iowa Supreme Court had declared the law restricting marriage to a legal union of one man and one woman unconstitutional. It’s not so much that yet another state rendered this kind of decision so much as it is a midwestern state. No offense to the Midwest, but it’s not thought of as a bastion of progressive thought. Had Vermont, NJ, NY, Oregon or Washington been next, perhaps, but really, Iowa? Way to jump the line.
I am heartened by this news, though, because it shows how despite the invective that some old guard hurl at homosexuals, they are definitely working against the trend.
I’m always excited when I see another article come out talking about how people are abandoning voicemail. So thank you, NYTimes, for your investigative piece.